Its Trauma and Long term effects
The one stand out at the Nomination meeting was Mark Sowalski and his book of Blue Tabs. It appears that if in the eyes of Mr Weir and the Member Processing System you were not eligible to be nominated you were marked for denial with a blue tab. Now I am sure this was just for easy reference by Mr Sowalski but did he ever stop to think of the stigma he has now attached to us “less than favorable members”.. Like Al Gore spending the rest of his life living with the fact that he could not beat a brainless border line retarded candidate like George Bush.Similar to this humiliation I will now have to spend my life knowing I was once a Sowalski “Blue Tab”. I have made this same comparison to brother Newell- v- Weir.
It was hard enough coming to realize that because I had refused to pay dues or assessment by the required 3 months that I was a crippled Union Man not fit to be nominated or hold Union Office. I had never abused the members money and had party time at the Marco Island Hilton which the members paid for. I had never stood by while the Empire Council stripped the 229 members of their Pension. I had never turned my back while the 229 Brothers were robbed of their health care. I never got room upgrades in Hawaii. I never was investigated by the Feds for my part in the ULLICO scandal. I never took gifts from investment firms or contractors. I never told a single member to go …while I took raise after raise to finance trip after trip to Ballys and the Montauk Yacht Club. I never turned my back leaving the members to explain to the kids why the trip to Disney was canceled because the Empire Council decided to keep my Vacation Check for another few months. I never stood on the podium and told the members lie after lie to run cover for the Empire Councils deceit. I never stood by and gave the Empire Council the right to fire me if I did not do as I was told. Oh. Wait thats covered in lack of IQ. Not lack of character. Had I only known that this is what makes a good Union Officer.
Is it not alarming the UBC Constitution does not make any of this illegal. It Does not make any of this grounds to be not eligible to hold Office. What it does focus on is paying dues and assessment money to be shuffled up to the Council and International. What does it imply when it provides no penalty to the thieves and Carpetbaggers who rob the members. It makes a member not in good standing and less of a member because they did not pay their 84 pieces of silver in the alloted 3 months. The message seems clear to me. You can screw the members all you want. You can Line your pockets with double pensions and ridiculous salaries. As long as you pay your 84 pieces of silver in the alloted 3 months the UBC will forget your name is Judas Iscariot and hold you up as the poster boys of UBC Unionism.
If these are the qualification’s of a good Union Officer in the UBC than you can count me out. I have paid dues and assessments for 19 years. I have never robbed or cheated my Union Brothers. I never stole from their wallets and took food form their family so I could have another paid Holiday and paid golf day. When it comes time to vote remember who has. Remember to that in the eyes of the UBC any member who refuses to ante up his hard earned cash to support to support and finance the theft form the members is not qualified to run for or hold Office. Remember in the eyes of the UBC those that turn their back on the members,take the golf outings to the Westin Resort,eat dinner at the Montauk Yacht Club and sit track side at Sartatoga while the 229 brothers were languishing in Trusteeship and 20 dollars a credited year for Pension are the good and Qualified candidates for Office. Remember that when you pull the lever to vote.
I guess I do not mind being a blue tab after all.